In `CallSpec2.setmulti` the `params` and `_arg2scope` dicts are always
set together.
Further, the `get_parametrized_fixture_keys` accesses `_arg2scope` for
all argnames without a check, which I think rules out that the code
protects against plugin shenanigans.
After removing the suppress, adjust the comment and code to make more
sense.
Dicts these days preserve order, so the sort is no longer needed to
achieve determinism.
As shown by the `test_dynamic_parametrized_ordering` test, this can
change the ordering of items, but only in equivalent ways (same number
of setups/teardowns per scope), it will just respect the user's given
ordering better (hence `vxlan` items now ordered before `vlan` items
compared to the previous ordering).
Follow up to #12006, let's put some comments clarifying `is_in_confcutdir` semantics, as this is not the first time someone misunderstands it.
Also removed an obsolete comment in `_loadconftestmodules`: we already set the `confcutdir` based on `rootdir`/`initfile` if not explicitly given.
Co-authored-by: Ran Benita <ran@unusedvar.com>
As the comment above it states, we need to keep the comparison simple so mypy can understand it, otherwise it will fail to properly handle this on Windows and will flag ``os.getuid()`` missing.
Test:
`warnings.warn()` expects that its first argument is a `str` or a
`Warning`, but since 9454fc38d3
`pytest.warns()` no longer allows `Warning` instances unless the first
argument the `Warning` was initialized with is a `str`. Furthermore, if
the `Warning` was created without arguments then `pytest.warns()` raises
an unexpected `IndexError`. The new tests reveal the problem.
Fix:
`pytest.warns()` now allows using `warnings.warn()` with a `Warning`
instance, as is required by Python, with one exception. If the warning
used is a `UserWarning` that was created by passing it arguments and the
first argument was not a `str` then `pytest.raises()` still considers
that an error. This is because if an invalid type was used in
`warnings.warn()` then Python creates a `UserWarning` anyways and it
becomes impossible for `pytest` to figure out if that was done
automatically or not.
[ran: rebased on previous commit]
Today `pyproject.toml` is the standard for declaring a Python project root, so seems reasonable to consider it for the ini configuration (and specially `rootdir`) in case we do not find other suitable candidates.
Related to #11311
Previously this would trigger an `AssertionError`.
While it could be considered a bug-fix, but given it now can be relied upon, it is probably better to consider it an improvement.
Fix#11311
Should be around 40% faster according to this simplified small benchmark:
python -m timeit "a=[0, 1, 2, 3, 4];b=list((e if i in {0, len(a) -1} else str(e)) for i, e in enumerate(a))"
200000 loops, best of 5: 1.12 usec per loop
python -m timeit "a=[0, 1, 2, 3, 4];b=list((a[0], *(str(e) for e in a[1:-1]), a[-1]))"
500000 loops, best of 5: 651 nsec per loop
python -m timeit "a=[0, 1, 2, 3, 4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16];b=list((e if i in {0, len(a) -1} else str(e)) for i, e in enumerate(a))"
100000 loops, best of 5: 3.31 usec per loop
python -m timeit "a=[0, 1, 2, 3, 4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16];b=list((a[0], *(str(e) for e in a[1:-1]), a[-1]))"
200000 loops, best of 5: 1.72 usec per loop
* Improve error message when using @pytest.fixture twice
While obvious in hindsight, this error message confused me. I thought my fixture
function was used in a test function twice, since the wording is ambiguous.
Also, the error does not tell me *which* function is the culprit.
Finally, this adds a test, which wasn't done in
cfd16d0dac where this was originally implemented.
* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
---------
Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Ran Benita
Eric Larson
Bruno Oliveira
Ben Leith
pre-commit-ci[bot]
Bruno Oliveira
pytest bot
Reagan Lee
Eero Vaher
dependabot[bot]
Dave Hall
Pierre Sassoulas
github-actions[bot]
Florian Bruhin