253 lines
		
	
	
		
			9.4 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			ReStructuredText
		
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			253 lines
		
	
	
		
			9.4 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			ReStructuredText
		
	
	
	
 | 
						|
.. _`unittest.TestCase`:
 | 
						|
.. _`unittest`:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
unittest.TestCase Support
 | 
						|
=========================
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
``pytest`` supports running Python ``unittest``-based tests out of the box.
 | 
						|
It's meant for leveraging existing ``unittest``-based test suites
 | 
						|
to use pytest as a test runner and also allow to incrementally adapt
 | 
						|
the test suite to take full advantage of pytest's features.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
To run an existing ``unittest``-style test suite using ``pytest``, type:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
.. code-block:: bash
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
    pytest tests
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
pytest will automatically collect ``unittest.TestCase`` subclasses and
 | 
						|
their ``test`` methods in ``test_*.py`` or ``*_test.py`` files.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Almost all ``unittest`` features are supported:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
* ``@unittest.skip`` style decorators;
 | 
						|
* ``setUp/tearDown``;
 | 
						|
* ``setUpClass/tearDownClass``;
 | 
						|
* ``setUpModule/tearDownModule``;
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
.. _`load_tests protocol`: https://docs.python.org/3/library/unittest.html#load-tests-protocol
 | 
						|
.. _`subtests`: https://docs.python.org/3/library/unittest.html#distinguishing-test-iterations-using-subtests
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Up to this point pytest does not have support for the following features:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
* `load_tests protocol`_;
 | 
						|
* `subtests`_;
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Benefits out of the box
 | 
						|
-----------------------
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
By running your test suite with pytest you can make use of several features,
 | 
						|
in most cases without having to modify existing code:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
* Obtain :ref:`more informative tracebacks <tbreportdemo>`;
 | 
						|
* :ref:`stdout and stderr <captures>` capturing;
 | 
						|
* :ref:`Test selection options <select-tests>` using ``-k`` and ``-m`` flags;
 | 
						|
* :ref:`maxfail`;
 | 
						|
* :ref:`--pdb <pdb-option>` command-line option for debugging on test failures
 | 
						|
  (see :ref:`note <pdb-unittest-note>` below);
 | 
						|
* Distribute tests to multiple CPUs using the `pytest-xdist <https://pypi.org/project/pytest-xdist/>`_ plugin;
 | 
						|
* Use :ref:`plain assert-statements <assert>` instead of ``self.assert*`` functions (`unittest2pytest
 | 
						|
  <https://pypi.org/project/unittest2pytest/>`__ is immensely helpful in this);
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
pytest features in ``unittest.TestCase`` subclasses
 | 
						|
---------------------------------------------------
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
The following pytest features work in ``unittest.TestCase`` subclasses:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
* :ref:`Marks <mark>`: :ref:`skip <skip>`, :ref:`skipif <skipif>`, :ref:`xfail <xfail>`;
 | 
						|
* :ref:`Auto-use fixtures <mixing-fixtures>`;
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
The following pytest features **do not** work, and probably
 | 
						|
never will due to different design philosophies:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
* :ref:`Fixtures <fixture>` (except for ``autouse`` fixtures, see :ref:`below <mixing-fixtures>`);
 | 
						|
* :ref:`Parametrization <parametrize>`;
 | 
						|
* :ref:`Custom hooks <writing-plugins>`;
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Third party plugins may or may not work well, depending on the plugin and the test suite.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
.. _mixing-fixtures:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Mixing pytest fixtures into ``unittest.TestCase`` subclasses using marks
 | 
						|
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Running your unittest with ``pytest`` allows you to use its
 | 
						|
:ref:`fixture mechanism <fixture>` with ``unittest.TestCase`` style
 | 
						|
tests.  Assuming you have at least skimmed the pytest fixture features,
 | 
						|
let's jump-start into an example that integrates a pytest ``db_class``
 | 
						|
fixture, setting up a class-cached database object, and then reference
 | 
						|
it from a unittest-style test:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
.. code-block:: python
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
    # content of conftest.py
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
    # we define a fixture function below and it will be "used" by
 | 
						|
    # referencing its name from tests
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
    import pytest
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
    @pytest.fixture(scope="class")
 | 
						|
    def db_class(request):
 | 
						|
        class DummyDB:
 | 
						|
            pass
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # set a class attribute on the invoking test context
 | 
						|
        request.cls.db = DummyDB()
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
This defines a fixture function ``db_class`` which - if used - is
 | 
						|
called once for each test class and which sets the class-level
 | 
						|
``db`` attribute to a ``DummyDB`` instance.  The fixture function
 | 
						|
achieves this by receiving a special ``request`` object which gives
 | 
						|
access to :ref:`the requesting test context <request-context>` such
 | 
						|
as the ``cls`` attribute, denoting the class from which the fixture
 | 
						|
is used.  This architecture de-couples fixture writing from actual test
 | 
						|
code and allows re-use of the fixture by a minimal reference, the fixture
 | 
						|
name.  So let's write an actual ``unittest.TestCase`` class using our
 | 
						|
fixture definition:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
.. code-block:: python
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
    # content of test_unittest_db.py
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
    import unittest
 | 
						|
    import pytest
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
    @pytest.mark.usefixtures("db_class")
 | 
						|
    class MyTest(unittest.TestCase):
 | 
						|
        def test_method1(self):
 | 
						|
            assert hasattr(self, "db")
 | 
						|
            assert 0, self.db  # fail for demo purposes
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        def test_method2(self):
 | 
						|
            assert 0, self.db  # fail for demo purposes
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
The ``@pytest.mark.usefixtures("db_class")`` class-decorator makes sure that
 | 
						|
the pytest fixture function ``db_class`` is called once per class.
 | 
						|
Due to the deliberately failing assert statements, we can take a look at
 | 
						|
the ``self.db`` values in the traceback:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
.. code-block:: pytest
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
    $ pytest test_unittest_db.py
 | 
						|
    =========================== test session starts ============================
 | 
						|
    platform linux -- Python 3.x.y, pytest-5.x.y, py-1.x.y, pluggy-0.x.y
 | 
						|
    cachedir: $PYTHON_PREFIX/.pytest_cache
 | 
						|
    rootdir: $REGENDOC_TMPDIR
 | 
						|
    collected 2 items
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
    test_unittest_db.py FF                                               [100%]
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
    ================================= FAILURES =================================
 | 
						|
    ___________________________ MyTest.test_method1 ____________________________
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
    self = <test_unittest_db.MyTest testMethod=test_method1>
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        def test_method1(self):
 | 
						|
            assert hasattr(self, "db")
 | 
						|
    >       assert 0, self.db  # fail for demo purposes
 | 
						|
    E       AssertionError: <conftest.db_class.<locals>.DummyDB object at 0xdeadbeef>
 | 
						|
    E       assert 0
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
    test_unittest_db.py:10: AssertionError
 | 
						|
    ___________________________ MyTest.test_method2 ____________________________
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
    self = <test_unittest_db.MyTest testMethod=test_method2>
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        def test_method2(self):
 | 
						|
    >       assert 0, self.db  # fail for demo purposes
 | 
						|
    E       AssertionError: <conftest.db_class.<locals>.DummyDB object at 0xdeadbeef>
 | 
						|
    E       assert 0
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
    test_unittest_db.py:13: AssertionError
 | 
						|
    ========================= short test summary info ==========================
 | 
						|
    FAILED test_unittest_db.py::MyTest::test_method1 - AssertionError: <conft...
 | 
						|
    FAILED test_unittest_db.py::MyTest::test_method2 - AssertionError: <conft...
 | 
						|
    ============================ 2 failed in 0.12s =============================
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
This default pytest traceback shows that the two test methods
 | 
						|
share the same ``self.db`` instance which was our intention
 | 
						|
when writing the class-scoped fixture function above.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Using autouse fixtures and accessing other fixtures
 | 
						|
---------------------------------------------------
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Although it's usually better to explicitly declare use of fixtures you need
 | 
						|
for a given test, you may sometimes want to have fixtures that are
 | 
						|
automatically used in a given context.  After all, the traditional
 | 
						|
style of unittest-setup mandates the use of this implicit fixture writing
 | 
						|
and chances are, you are used to it or like it.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
You can flag fixture functions with ``@pytest.fixture(autouse=True)``
 | 
						|
and define the fixture function in the context where you want it used.
 | 
						|
Let's look at an ``initdir`` fixture which makes all test methods of a
 | 
						|
``TestCase`` class execute in a temporary directory with a
 | 
						|
pre-initialized ``samplefile.ini``.  Our ``initdir`` fixture itself uses
 | 
						|
the pytest builtin :ref:`tmpdir <tmpdir>` fixture to delegate the
 | 
						|
creation of a per-test temporary directory:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
.. code-block:: python
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
    # content of test_unittest_cleandir.py
 | 
						|
    import pytest
 | 
						|
    import unittest
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
    class MyTest(unittest.TestCase):
 | 
						|
        @pytest.fixture(autouse=True)
 | 
						|
        def initdir(self, tmpdir):
 | 
						|
            tmpdir.chdir()  # change to pytest-provided temporary directory
 | 
						|
            tmpdir.join("samplefile.ini").write("# testdata")
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        def test_method(self):
 | 
						|
            with open("samplefile.ini") as f:
 | 
						|
                s = f.read()
 | 
						|
            assert "testdata" in s
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Due to the ``autouse`` flag the ``initdir`` fixture function will be
 | 
						|
used for all methods of the class where it is defined.  This is a
 | 
						|
shortcut for using a ``@pytest.mark.usefixtures("initdir")`` marker
 | 
						|
on the class like in the previous example.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Running this test module ...:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
.. code-block:: pytest
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
    $ pytest -q test_unittest_cleandir.py
 | 
						|
    .                                                                    [100%]
 | 
						|
    1 passed in 0.12s
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
... gives us one passed test because the ``initdir`` fixture function
 | 
						|
was executed ahead of the ``test_method``.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
.. note::
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
   ``unittest.TestCase`` methods cannot directly receive fixture
 | 
						|
   arguments as implementing that is likely to inflict
 | 
						|
   on the ability to run general unittest.TestCase test suites.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
   The above ``usefixtures`` and ``autouse`` examples should help to mix in
 | 
						|
   pytest fixtures into unittest suites.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
   You can also gradually move away from subclassing from ``unittest.TestCase`` to *plain asserts*
 | 
						|
   and then start to benefit from the full pytest feature set step by step.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
.. _pdb-unittest-note:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
.. note::
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
    Due to architectural differences between the two frameworks, setup and
 | 
						|
    teardown for ``unittest``-based tests is performed during the ``call`` phase
 | 
						|
    of testing instead of in ``pytest``'s standard ``setup`` and ``teardown``
 | 
						|
    stages. This can be important to understand in some situations, particularly
 | 
						|
    when reasoning about errors. For example, if a ``unittest``-based suite
 | 
						|
    exhibits errors during setup, ``pytest`` will report no errors during its
 | 
						|
    ``setup`` phase and will instead raise the error during ``call``.
 |