Since pytest now requires Python>=3.7, we can use the stdlib attrs
clone, dataclasses, instead of the OG package.
attrs is still somewhat nicer than dataclasses and has some extra
functionality, but for pytest usage there's not really a justification
IMO to impose the extra dependency on users when a standard alternative
exists.
* [pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate
* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ran Benita <ran@unusedvar.com>
* [pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate
* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
* manual fixes after configuration update
* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Anthony Sottile <asottile@umich.edu>
In current pytest, the same expression is matched against all items. But
it is re-parsed for every match.
Add support for "compiling" an expression and reusing the result. Errors
may only occur during compilation.
This is done by parsing the expression into a Python `ast.Expression`,
then `compile()`ing it into a code object. Evaluation is then done using
`eval()`.
Note: historically we used to use `eval` directly on the user input --
this is not the case here, the expression is entirely under our control
according to our grammar, we just JIT-compile it to Python as a
(completely safe) optimization.
Previously, the expressions given to the `-m` and `-k` options were
evaluated with `eval`. This causes a few issues:
- Python keywords cannot be used.
- Constants like numbers, None, True, False are not handled correctly.
- Various syntax like numeric operators and `X if Y else Z` is supported
unintentionally.
- `eval()` is somewhat dangerous for arbitrary input.
- Can fail in many ways so requires `except Exception`.
The format we want to support is quite simple, so change to a custom
parser. This fixes the issues above, and gives us full control of the
format, so can be documented comprehensively and even be extended in the
future if we wish.