Regressed in 6.1.0 in 62e249a1f9.
The `x` is an `str` but is expected to be a `pathlib.Path`. Not caught
by mypy because `config.getini()` returns `Any`.
Fix by just removing the `bestrelpath` call:
- testpaths are always relative to the rootdir, it thus would be very
unusual to specify an absolute path there.
- The code was wrong even before the regression: `py.path.local`'s
`bestrelpath` function expects a `py.path.local`, not an `str`. But it
had some weird `try ... except AttributeError` fallback which just
returns the argument, i.e. it was a no-op. So there is no behavior
change.
- It seems reasonable to me to just print the full path if that's what
the ini specifies.
(cherry picked from commit 61f80a783a)
This indicates at least for people using type checkers that these
classes are not designed for inheritance and we make no stability
guarantees regarding inheritance of them.
Currently this doesn't show up in the docs. Sphinx does actually support
`@final`, however it only works when imported directly from `typing`,
while we import from `_pytest.compat`.
In the future there might also be a `@sealed` decorator which would
cover some more cases.
For decorated functions, the lineno of the FunctionDef AST node points
to the `def` line, not to the first decorator line. On the other hand,
in code objects, the `co_firstlineno` points to the first decorator
line.
Assertion rewriting inserts some imports to code it rewrites. The
imports are inserted at the lineno of the first statement in the AST. In
turn, the code object compiled from the rewritten AST uses the lineno of
the first statement (which is the first inserted import).
This means that given a module like this,
```py
@foo
@bar
def baz(): pass
```
the lineno of the code object without assertion rewriting
(`--assertion=plain`) is 1, but with assertion rewriting it is 3.
And *this* causes some issues for the exception repr when e.g. the
decorator line is invalid and raises during collection. The code becomes
confused and crashes with
INTERNALERROR> File "_pytest/_code/code.py", line 638, in get_source
INTERNALERROR> lines.append(space_prefix + source.lines[line_index].strip())
INTERNALERROR> IndexError: list index out of range
Fix it by special casing decorators. Maybe there are other cases like
this but off hand I can't think of another Python construct where the
lineno of the item would be after its first line, and this is the only
such issue we have had reported.
When a name is exported from `pytest`, prefer to refer to it by that
rather than its `_pytest` import path. It is shorter and more
appropriate in user-facing documentation (although that's not really
visible).
Our plan is to expose more names for typing purposes, in which can this
could be more comprehensive.
Warnings are a central part of Python, so much that Python itself has
command-line and environtment variables to handle warnings.
By moving the concept of warning handling into Config, it becomes natural to
filter warnings issued as early as possible, even before the "_pytest.warnings"
plugin is given a chance to spring into action. This also avoids the weird
coupling between config and the warnings plugin that was required before.
Fix#6681Fix#2891Fix#7620Fix#7626Close#7649
Co-authored-by: Ran Benita <ran@unusedvar.com>
Inline `_makeitem()` so that `self.ihook` (which is moderately
expensive) can be called only once.
Note: the removed test "test_makeitem_non_underscore" comes from an old
behavior of skipping names that start with `_` which has since been
generalized, making the test no longer relevant.
When a Python object (module/class/instance) is collected, for each name
in `obj.__dict__` (and up its MRO) the pytest_pycollect_makeitem hook is
called for potentially creating a node for it.
These Python objects have a bunch of builtin attributes that are
extremely unlikely to be collected. But due to their pervasiveness,
dispatching the hook for them ends up being mildly expensive and also
pollutes PYTEST_DEBUG=1 output and such.
Let's just ignore these attributes.
On the pandas test suite commit 04e9e0afd476b1b8bed930e47bf60e,
collect only, irrelevant lines snipped, about 5% improvement:
Before:
```
51195095 function calls (48844352 primitive calls) in 39.089 seconds
ncalls tottime percall cumtime percall filename:lineno(function)
226602/54 0.145 0.000 38.940 0.721 manager.py:90(_hookexec)
72227 0.285 0.000 20.146 0.000 python.py:424(_makeitem)
72227 0.171 0.000 16.678 0.000 python.py:218(pytest_pycollect_makeitem)
```
After:
```
48410921 function calls (46240870 primitive calls) in 36.950 seconds
ncalls tottime percall cumtime percall filename:lineno(function)
181429/54 0.113 0.000 36.777 0.681 manager.py:90(_hookexec)
27054 0.130 0.000 17.755 0.001 python.py:465(_makeitem)
27054 0.121 0.000 16.219 0.001 python.py:218(pytest_pycollect_makeitem)
```
In ff8b7884e8 NOTSET was changed to a
singleton enum, which ended up unexpectedly triggering a code path in ID
generation which checks for `isinstance(Enum)`.
Add an explicit case for it, which is not too bad anyway.
This is a more sensible interface for matchnodes.
This also fixes a sort-of bug where a recursive call to matchnodes
raises NoMatch which would terminate the entire tree, even if other
branches may find a match. Though I don't think it's actually possible.
This reverts commit f10ab021e2.
The commit was good in that it removed a non-trivial amount of code
duplication. However it was done in the wrong layer (nodes.py) and split
up a major part of the collection (the filesystem traversal) to a
separate class making it harder to understand.
We should try to reduce the duplication, but in a more appropriate
manner.
Ran Benita
Manuel Mariñez
Sorin Sbarnea
Florian Bruhin
Bruno Oliveira
Anthony Sottile