The docstring (and function name itself) described things as if IDs are
being assigned to the argnames, but actually they're assigned to the
parameter sets.
* Add docs on pytest.warns(None) deprecation
* Add new section for common warnings use cases
* Fix references for warnings use cases
* Fix reference link
I think this named function makes the code a bit easier to understand.
Also change the check to explicitly check for "is a sub-path of" instead
of the previous check which only worked assuming that path is within
confcutdir or a direct parent of it.
This made the cache not work as intended, causing a major slowdown.
See #9478 for discussion and context.
Authored-by: Anthony Sottile <asottile@umich.edu>
Before 7.0.0rc1, the function accepted `Union[str, py.path.local]`, and
`py.path.local` compares equal to the string path, so a user was able to
pass the path as a string and it would work. In 7.0.0rc1 we changed the
`py.path.local` to `Path` which doesn't compare equal to the string
path, which breaks compatibility (e.g. the `sybil` package).
This restores compatibility for this function by accepting any
`os.PathLike[str]` and only comparing the string representations.
Since commit 89f0b5b5a2 cases as in the
added test started to fail, like they do for the standard pytest names
(`setup_module` etc). But the name `setup` in particular is way too
common for us to start taking it over more aggressively, so restore the
previous behavior which required the object to be callable.
Fix#9391.
The `pytest_pycollector_makeitem` argument `collector` is currently
annotated with type `PyCollector`. As part of #7469, that would have
required us to expose it in the public API. But really it's an
implementation detail, not something we want to expose. So replace the
annotation with the concrete python collector types that are passed.
Strictly speaking, `pytest_pycollector_makeitem` is called from
`PyCollector.collect()`, so the new type annotation is incorrect if
another type subclasses `PyCollector`. But the set of python collectors
is closed (mapping to language constructs), and the type is private, so
there shouldn't be any other deriving classes, and we can consider it
effectively sealed (unfortunately Python does not provide a way to
express this - yet?).
