Manual minimal backport from commit e89d23b247.
Fix#12355.
In the issue, it was reported that the `reorder_items` has quadratic (or
worse...) behavior with certain simple parametrizations. After some
debugging I found that the problem happens because the "Fix
items_by_argkey order" loop keeps adding the same item to the deque,
and it reaches epic sizes which causes the slowdown.
I don't claim to understand how the `reorder_items` algorithm works, but
if as far as I understand, if an item already exists in the deque, the
correct thing to do is to move it to the front. Since a deque doesn't
have such an (efficient) operation, this switches to `OrderedDict` which
can efficiently append from both sides, deduplicate and move to front.
* added test case in testing/python/approx.py based on test case provided by reporter in issue #12114
* test cases pass for pytest testing/python/approx.py
* expanded the type annotation to include objects which may cast to a array and renamed other_side to other_side_as_array and asserted that it is not none
Now `importlib` mode will correctly set the imported modules as an attribute of their parent modules.
As helpfully posted on #12194, that's how the Python import module works so we should follow suit.
In addition, we also try to import the parent modules as part of the process of importing a child module, again mirroring how Python importing works.
Fix#12194
Previously we used a hand crafted approach to detect namespace packages, however we should rely on ``importlib`` to detect them for us.
Fix#12112
---------
Co-authored-by: Ran Benita <ran@unusedvar.com>
Creating and initializing the cache directory is interruptible; this
avoids a pathological case where interrupting a cache write can cause
the cache directory to never be properly initialized with its supporting
files.
Unify `Cache.mkdir` with `Cache.set` while I'm here so the former also
properly initializes the cache directory.
Closes#12167.
and also fixes a regression in pytest 8.0.0 where `setup_method` crashes
if the class has static or class method tests.
It is allowed to have a test class with static/class methods which
request non-static/class method fixtures (including `setup_method`
xunit-fixture). I take it as a given that we need to support this
somewhat odd scenario (stdlib unittest also supports it).
This raises a question -- when a staticmethod test requests a bound
fixture, what is that fixture's `self`?
stdlib unittest says - a fresh instance for the test.
Previously, pytest said - some instance that is shared by all
static/class methods. This is definitely broken since it breaks test
isolation.
Change pytest to behave like stdlib unittest here.
In practice, this means stopping to rely on `self.obj.__self__` to get
to the instance from the test function's binding. This doesn't work
because staticmethods are not bound to anything.
Instead, keep the instance explicitly and use that.
BTW, I think this will allow us to change `Class`'s fixture collection
(`parsefactories`) to happen on the class itself instead of a class
instance, allowing us to avoid one class instantiation. But needs more
work.
Fixes#12065.
- Separate the requesting from the requested.
- Avoid the term "factory", I think most people don't distinguish
between "fixture" and "fixture function" (i.e. "factory") and would
find the term "factory" unfamiliar.
Previously, the `obj` of a `TestCaseFunction` (the unittest plugin item
type) was the unbound method. This is unlike regular `Class` where the
`obj` is a bound method to a fresh instance.
This difference necessitated several special cases in in places outside
of the unittest plugin, such as `FixtureDef` and `FixtureRequest`, and
made things a bit harder to understand.
Instead, match how the python plugin does it, including collecting
fixtures from a fresh instance.
The downside is that now this instance for fixture-collection is kept
around in memory, but it's the same as `Class` so nothing new. Users
should only initialize stuff in `setUp`/`setUpClass` and similar
methods, and not in `__init__` which is generally off-limits in
`TestCase` subclasses.
I am not sure why there was a difference in the first place, though I
will say the previous unittest approach is probably the preferable one,
but first let's get consistency.