Point to stable docs instead of latest

Now that our master might contain new features, it is best to point
users to the stable docs rather than the latest
This commit is contained in:
Bruno Oliveira
2020-07-07 07:39:35 -03:00
parent b6a31b9c4d
commit 93d2ccbfb7
121 changed files with 226 additions and 226 deletions
+3 -3
View File
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ with these improvements:
- new @pytest.mark.parametrize decorator to run tests with different arguments
- new metafunc.parametrize() API for parametrizing arguments independently
- see examples at http://pytest.org/en/latest/example/parametrize.html
- see examples at http://pytest.org/en/stable/example/parametrize.html
- NOTE that parametrize() related APIs are still a bit experimental
and might change in future releases.
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ with these improvements:
- "-m markexpr" option for selecting tests according to their mark
- a new "markers" ini-variable for registering test markers for your project
- the new "--strict" bails out with an error if using unregistered markers.
- see examples at http://pytest.org/en/latest/example/markers.html
- see examples at http://pytest.org/en/stable/example/markers.html
* duration profiling: new "--duration=N" option showing the N slowest test
execution or setup/teardown calls. This is most useful if you want to
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ Changes between 2.1.3 and 2.2.0
or through plugin hooks. Also introduce a "--strict" option which
will treat unregistered markers as errors
allowing to avoid typos and maintain a well described set of markers
for your test suite. See examples at http://pytest.org/en/latest/mark.html
for your test suite. See examples at http://pytest.org/en/stable/mark.html
and its links.
- issue50: introduce "-m marker" option to select tests based on markers
(this is a stricter and more predictable version of "-k" in that "-m"