Correct code blocks in docs
This commit is contained in:
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ The py.test Development Team
|
||||
Thanks `@biern`_ for the PR.
|
||||
|
||||
* Fix `traceback style docs`_ to describe all of the available options
|
||||
(auto/long/short/line/native/no), with `auto` being the default since v2.6.
|
||||
(auto/long/short/line/native/no), with ``auto`` being the default since v2.6.
|
||||
Thanks `@hackebrot`_ for the PR.
|
||||
|
||||
* Fix (`#1422`_): junit record_xml_property doesn't allow multiple records
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -299,10 +299,10 @@ Skip and xfail marks can also be applied in this way, see :ref:`skip/xfail with
|
||||
.. note::
|
||||
|
||||
If the data you are parametrizing happen to be single callables, you need to be careful
|
||||
when marking these items. `pytest.mark.xfail(my_func)` won't work because it's also the
|
||||
when marking these items. ``pytest.mark.xfail(my_func)`` won't work because it's also the
|
||||
signature of a function being decorated. To resolve this ambiguity, you need to pass a
|
||||
reason argument:
|
||||
`pytest.mark.xfail(func_bar, reason="Issue#7")`.
|
||||
``pytest.mark.xfail(func_bar, reason="Issue#7")``.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
.. _`adding a custom marker from a plugin`:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ You can then install your package in "editable" mode::
|
||||
pip install -e .
|
||||
|
||||
which lets you change your source code (both tests and application) and rerun tests at will.
|
||||
This is similar to running `python setup.py develop` or `conda develop` in that it installs
|
||||
This is similar to running ``python setup.py develop`` or ``conda develop`` in that it installs
|
||||
your package using a symlink to your development code.
|
||||
|
||||
Once you are done with your work and want to make sure that your actual
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -52,8 +52,6 @@ should add ``--strict`` to ``addopts``:
|
||||
serial
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
.. `marker-iteration`
|
||||
|
||||
Marker revamp and iteration
|
||||
---------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user