From 0fd50b8ed83ca9bc5c9fcac31cc13ac1abbd26fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 08:31:58 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] spelling: suppressing Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> --- doc/en/how-to/writing_hook_functions.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/en/how-to/writing_hook_functions.rst b/doc/en/how-to/writing_hook_functions.rst index 5d0a52f9d..f4c00d04f 100644 --- a/doc/en/how-to/writing_hook_functions.rst +++ b/doc/en/how-to/writing_hook_functions.rst @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ object, the wrapper may modify that result, but it's probably better to avoid it If the hook implementation failed with an exception, the wrapper can handle that exception using a ``try-catch-finally`` around the ``yield``, by propagating it, -supressing it, or raising a different exception entirely. +suppressing it, or raising a different exception entirely. For more information, consult the :ref:`pluggy documentation about hook wrappers `.