Issue1388 (#1389)
* Calculation of chunk range limits was ignoring num_cpu bug introduced by me in #1262 - should fix #1388 * Calculation of range limits was ignoring num_cpu bug introduced by me in #1262 * Calculation of chunk range limits was ignoring num_cpu bug introduced by me in #1262 * Calculation of chunk range limits was ignoring num_cpu bug introduced by me in #1262 * Calculation of chunk range limits was ignoring num_cpu bug introduced by me in #1262 * Calculation of chunk range limits was ignoring num_cpu bug introduced by me in #1262
This commit is contained in:
@@ -230,10 +230,10 @@ int CNAME(BLASLONG m, BLASLONG n, BLASLONG ku, BLASLONG kl, FLOAT *alpha, FLOAT
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef TRANSA
|
||||
range_m[num_cpu] = num_cpu * ((m + 15) & ~15);
|
||||
if (range_m[num_cpu] > m) range_m[num_cpu] = m;
|
||||
if (range_m[num_cpu] > m * num_cpu) range_m[num_cpu] = m * num_cpu;
|
||||
#else
|
||||
range_m[num_cpu] = num_cpu * ((n + 15) & ~15);
|
||||
if (range_m[num_cpu] > n) range_m[num_cpu] = n;
|
||||
if (range_m[num_cpu] > n * num_cpu) range_m[num_cpu] = n * num_cpu;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
queue[num_cpu].mode = mode;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user