Many Analyzers need to measure the width of an integer and all today
use hacks. This change causes analysis.Pass to retain and expose the
type sizing function used during type checking.
This in turn requires go/packages to retain and expose the type sizing
function in Packages.TypesSizes, which addresses a longstanding need
among many of its clients.
Change-Id: Ia8362019bcde34c10cb4fbc38cfdfddcbef3eb5c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/158317
Reviewed-by: Michael Matloob <matloob@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Michael Matloob <matloob@golang.org>
The cgocall analyzer was originally written in vet to analyze "raw" cgo files,
which are type-checked on a best-effort basis. However, the go/analysis
API presents analyzers with "cooked" cgo files, which are well-typed
legal Go but obscure the relationship between a call C.f(...) and its arguments.
Prior to this CL, cgocall attempted to "uncook" the file, which was
as predictably fragile as it sounds, and it rapidly broke as the cgo
recipe evolved.
This change causes cgocall to parse, modify, type-check and analyze "raw"
cgo files. The approach (based on dot-importing the "cooked" package)
is rather too clever but should be more robust than the one it replaces.
Fixesgolang/go#28566
Change-Id: I3092a313c64d27153eaaa115fe8635abfed17023
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/147317
Reviewed-by: Michael Matloob <matloob@golang.org>
...and other trivial cleanups.
Multi-line doc comments have been moved to exported Doc constants for
the sake of godoc.
Change-Id: Ib1cbec5806c699d51283c34685c4cd96953f5384
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/142360
Reviewed-by: Michael Matloob <matloob@golang.org>
This checker needed some reworking because whereas vet sees
unprocessed cgo source files (with partial type information), the
analysis API sees cgo-processed files with complete type information.
However, that means the checker must effectively undo some of the
transformations done by cgo, making it more fragile during changes to
cgo.
Change-Id: I3a243260f59b16e2e546e8f3e4585b93d3731192
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/141157
Reviewed-by: Michael Matloob <matloob@golang.org>
Alan Donovan